Extension methods benchmarked. Slower alternatives replaced.

EvenPerfectBitScanner.Benchmarks/Mod128UIntBenchmarks.cs

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
 using BenchmarkDotNet.Attributes;
 using BenchmarkDotNet.Jobs;
-using PerfectNumbers.Core;
 
 namespace EvenPerfectBitScanner.Benchmarks;
 
@@ -8,10 +8,17 @@ namespace EvenPerfectBitScanner.Benchmarks;
 [MemoryDiagnoser]
 public class Mod128UIntBenchmarks
 {
-    [Params(128U, 2047U, 65535U, 2147483647U)]
+	[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
+	public static uint Mod128(uint value) => value & 127U;
+
+    [Params(3UL, 5UL, 6UL, 8UL, 10UL, 11UL, 32UL, 64UL, 128UL, 256UL, 2_047UL, 8_191UL, 65_535UL, 131_071UL, 2_147_483_647UL, uint.MaxValue - 1_024UL, uint.MaxValue - 511UL, uint.MaxValue - 255UL, uint.MaxValue - 127UL, uint.MaxValue - 63UL, uint.MaxValue - 31UL, uint.MaxValue - 17UL, uint.MaxValue)]
     public uint Value { get; set; }
 
-    [Benchmark(Baseline = true)]
+	/// <summary>
+	/// Fastest most of the times. It's usually much faster than it's slower.
+	/// </summary>
+	/// <returns></returns>
+	[Benchmark(Baseline = true)]
     public uint ModuloOperator()
     {
         return Value % 128U;
@@ -20,7 +27,7 @@ public class Mod128UIntBenchmarks
     [Benchmark]
     public uint ExtensionMethod()
     {
-        return Value.Mod128();
+        return Mod128(Value);
     }
 }